Ash_Wk
27-06-2003, 04:50 PM
Hey all, newbie here.
I'm looking to upgrade my machine and am considering overclocking and need some advice. I was wondering, generally if the 3GHZ baby tends to overclock any better than a 2.8? i.e. if I had both CPU's and overclocked them to the max, assuming everything else is equal, will the 3GHZ always be able to reach 200MHZ (roughly) higher than the 2.8 GHZ cpu?
Just interested as I would have thought there would be a theoretical maximum that any of the CPU's would reach and was wondering if the CPU would give out before the other components (due to FSB increase), and hence a 2.8 would be able to get as nearly the same max as a 3GHZ
Cheers
I'm looking to upgrade my machine and am considering overclocking and need some advice. I was wondering, generally if the 3GHZ baby tends to overclock any better than a 2.8? i.e. if I had both CPU's and overclocked them to the max, assuming everything else is equal, will the 3GHZ always be able to reach 200MHZ (roughly) higher than the 2.8 GHZ cpu?
Just interested as I would have thought there would be a theoretical maximum that any of the CPU's would reach and was wondering if the CPU would give out before the other components (due to FSB increase), and hence a 2.8 would be able to get as nearly the same max as a 3GHZ
Cheers