PDA

View Full Version : GPU Shootout with ut2k3 engine...

AcurA
02-07-2002, 01:45 AM
More benchmarks (http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.html?i=1647).
Pretty much every video card u can think of - including Parhelia.
Interesting the diff bet the 128&64 flavours of the 4200.
KingJackal
02-07-2002, 02:06 AM
Yes, very very intesting.

The 64MB card blows the 128MB card out of the water in EVERY test.

....looks like the 128MB Ti4200 might not be a very wise purchase decision AT ALL. Better to save money with a 64MB Ti4200, or stretch to a Ti4400. :eek:
AcurA
02-07-2002, 02:16 AM
stoked bout the 4400 - did nicely :D
I'm all set for ut2k3 :cool:

... and i would ave bet money that u'd still be up KJ LOL :p
KingJackal
02-07-2002, 04:47 AM
Originally posted by AcurA
... and i would ave bet money that u'd still be up KJ LOL :p

Hahahaa - that bet is especially safe during holidays. I'm weird - I prefer to sleep days and work nights.
*shrugs*
:D

*get's back to work, content there's nothing left to read on the forum*
Humantuckshop
02-07-2002, 07:00 AM
Originally posted by KingJackal


Hahahaa - that bet is especially safe during holidays. I'm weird - I prefer to sleep days and work nights.
*shrugs*
:D




I reckon that's normal, KJ. :D

Anyway, I think it will be 1024x768 High detail for my GF3 Ti200.

[StarTrek quote]
She just won't go any higher cap'n!
[Startrek quote]

;)
Solid Snake
02-07-2002, 10:10 AM
Nie to know that a GF4 Ti 4600 purchase wasn't completely wasteful :D
Antallica
02-07-2002, 10:30 AM
Well it's nice to see that my GF2 Ti will keep me goin for a little while longer. Damn good benches on the GF4's *drool* :D
Genesis
02-07-2002, 03:20 PM
Nice to see the MX460 holding it up quiet nicely against the Ti200 :P
Ragnor
02-07-2002, 03:31 PM
Yeah but who has a GF4 MX460 ?

Most people got GF4 MX440's because they were cheap and good value for money..

There wasn't much difference in price between a GF4 MX 460 and a GF3 TI 200... Look at 1024x768 - DM-Asbestos High Detail there's a good 20fps difference between the two (so how do you define keeping up?).

Interesting to see how clock speed on the memory made more difference then having 128mb.. I wish they'd overclocked the mem on the 128mb gf4 ti 4200 to the same clock speed as the 64mb version.. then we could say "yes 128mb makes no difference in Unreal T II" or "128mb does make a difference of xx fps"...

They also didn't have a gf3 ti 200 128mb in there to compare against the gf3 ti 200 64mb version.. that would of been another good gauge of the value of an extra 64mb ram. Especially since the 64mb and 128mb gf3 ti 200's are clocked the same by default.
AcurA
02-07-2002, 03:39 PM
but then the 64meg 4200 prolly can overclock quite nicely too... specially having better quality/ns ram.
My 4400 can easilly o/c to a 4600 spec - have u seen what a 4600 can O/c 2??
Ragnor
02-07-2002, 03:45 PM
Yeah I'm waiting too see a brave manufacturer put low ns ram on a 128mb gf4 Ti 4200.. of course it will cost.

Also bear in mind ns isn't everything, eg: 3.8ns hynix ram often doesn't overclock as well as 4ns micron or samsung.
AcurA
02-07-2002, 04:06 PM
dam - this complicates things even more... anyone knows what the leadtek use?
Humantuckshop
02-07-2002, 04:24 PM
Originally posted by AcurA
dam - this complicates things even more... anyone knows what the leadtek use?



I'm pretty sure it's Hynix.
Ragnor
02-07-2002, 04:48 PM
You just have to trawl the net looking at reviews of the different brands, good ones will tell you what chips the ram are (hans usually does ;) )

So when are you reviewing a leadtek Hans?

Leadtek's seem to be overclocking well .. so maybe I'm wrong about those hynix chips. Still something to think about though.
AcurA
02-07-2002, 05:11 PM
THG did u GF4 review and overclocked a few of them cards - the leadtek did very well :D (well they all o/c to bout the same % - leadtek was slightly in front)
That prolly the heaksink design i'm guessing...
Gh0s7 L3mUr
02-07-2002, 07:12 PM
Originally posted by AcurA
THG did u GF4 review and overclocked a few of them cards - the leadtek did very well :D (well they all o/c to bout the same % - leadtek was slightly in front)
That prolly the heaksink design i'm guessing...

Wonder what the Leadtek would do with a PixelIce on it. ;) :D
Hans
02-07-2002, 07:35 PM
I've done the bench for the Leadtek.. Going to do the write up in a couple of days and you guys can expect it maybe in 2 weeks time??
Humantuckshop
02-07-2002, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by Hans
I've done the bench for the Leadtek.. Going to do the write up in a couple of days and you guys can expect it maybe in 2 weeks time??



*And a little boy waits.* :p



Yes, I know it's cheesy and it's been said before, but I couldn't resist. Sorry.
AcurA
03-07-2002, 12:46 AM
what vers hans - 4400 & 4600? Vivo?
Hans
03-07-2002, 01:07 AM
Ti-4200, 64MB without video out only.
Ragnor
03-07-2002, 07:17 PM
Han's, can you confirm what the ram is on the leadtek ti4200 ... 3.8ns hynix..?
Hans
03-07-2002, 07:51 PM
Like I said in this thread (http://forums.overclockers.co.nz/showthread.php?s=&threadid=128&perpage=20&pagenumber=2), it's 4ns.
Elle T
05-07-2002, 04:08 PM
those Chaintech 128mb ones are the cheapest atm $285+gst