David Kemps
06-02-2003, 07:11 PM
just wondering how much different overclocking really makes in terms of faster loading, better framerates in games etc?
cause ive gotta xp1700, soltek drv4, gf2 ti, 256ddr, etc and in 3dmark2001se i got:
standard vid card and cpu speed 4695
cpu standard and vid card increase by 30 for core and memory clock 4966
cpu standard and vid card increase by 30 for core clock and 50 for memory clock 4968 then crashed afterwards
cpu to 1900+ and vid card increased by 30 for core and memory clock 5063
cpu is just overclocked by increasing fsb speed to 145 it doesnt like more than that. (maybe a pci card not liking it?)
and also in sandra 2003 pro it shows big difference in performance as well
its just i cant really notice a great deal in games etc, is it just me or do u need to overclock more than that to get performance noticeable???
by the way 1467mhz to 1610mhz for newbie overclocker cant be bad?haha i wanna do more but have to unlock cpu. (try for the 2nd time!haha)
thanks guys
Dave
cause ive gotta xp1700, soltek drv4, gf2 ti, 256ddr, etc and in 3dmark2001se i got:
standard vid card and cpu speed 4695
cpu standard and vid card increase by 30 for core and memory clock 4966
cpu standard and vid card increase by 30 for core clock and 50 for memory clock 4968 then crashed afterwards
cpu to 1900+ and vid card increased by 30 for core and memory clock 5063
cpu is just overclocked by increasing fsb speed to 145 it doesnt like more than that. (maybe a pci card not liking it?)
and also in sandra 2003 pro it shows big difference in performance as well
its just i cant really notice a great deal in games etc, is it just me or do u need to overclock more than that to get performance noticeable???
by the way 1467mhz to 1610mhz for newbie overclocker cant be bad?haha i wanna do more but have to unlock cpu. (try for the 2nd time!haha)
thanks guys
Dave